Desenvolvendo as tags semânticas
Levy >> web semantica >> é uma proposta de busca por conceitos semânticos. a necessidade da adoção de um padrão para a chamada “web semântica” – que permitirá que todo o conhecimento seja coordenado automaticamente por conceitos, e não mais simplesmente pelos links entre documentos. o filósofo desenvolveu uma linguagem universal capaz de compreender as ideias expressas em qualquer idioma e que, ao mesmo tempo, pode ser processada por computadores; “Isso significaria o fim da fragmentação da informação, atualmente dividida por conta de barreiras de linguagem e escolhas diversas de sistemas de organização”
A análise detalhada da terceira camada do ciberespaço (a web) era necessária para justificar a construção detalhada de uma quarta camada, propriamente semântica. A principal função desta quarta camada, que chamo inteligência possível, é endereçar os conceitos, as idéias ou as noções e, conseqüentemente, indexar os documentos pelos conteúdos, independentemente das línguas naturais nas quais estes documentos foram produzidos e os sistemas de classificação particulares que permitem hoje explorá-los.
acho interessante esse caminho do levy. apesar de eu ter quase que escurraçado as idéias do levy nos idos de 2000 en diante. Pois. no meu entender, o levy não conseguiu entender as redes de colaboração, o software livre e os efeitos da linkania.
weinberger >> everything is miscellaneous
The digital revolution in organization sweeps beyond how we find odd photos and beyond how we organize our businesses’ information assets. In fact, the third-order practices that make a company’s existing assets more profitable, increase customer loyalty, and seriously reduce costs are the Trojan horse of the information age. As we all get used to them, third-order practices undermine some of our most deeply ingrained ways of thinking about the world and our knowledge of it.
For example, medical information that used to come only through the careful filters of medical experts and medical publications is now available to everyone prior to the basic housekeeping processes of being gone through and put away. The miscellanizing of this information not only breaks it out of its traditional organizational categories but also removes the implicit authority granted by being published in the paper world. Second-order organization, it turns out, is often as much about authority as about making things easier to find.
We have entire industries and institutions built on the fact that the paper order severely limits how things can be organized. Museums, educational curricula, newspapers, the travel industry, and television schedules are all based on the assumption that in the second-order world, we need experts to go through information, ideas, and knowledge and put them neatly away.
But now we—the customers, the employees, anyone—can route around the second order. We can confront the miscellaneous directly in all its unfulfilled glory. We can do it ourselves and, more significantly, we can do it together, figuring out the arrangements that make sense for us now and the new arrangements that make sense a minute later. Not only can we find what we need faster, but traditional authorities cannot maintain themselves by insisting that we have to go to them. The miscellaneous order is not transforming only business. It is changing how we think the world itself is organized and—perhaps more important—who we think has the authority to tell us so.
continuando:
tagging lets us organize the vastness of the Web -- and even our email, as Gmail has shown -- using the categories that matter to us as individuals. You may want to tag,
tagging is social. Tags used to be called “keywords,” and they've been with us for a long time. But only recently have we been making them public. That has big effects. (...)
Tagging also allows social groups to form around similarities of interests and points of view. If you're using the same tags as I do, we probably share some deep commonalities.
emergência das tags >> zeitgeist
mapeamentos das tags >> mapeiam os conhecimentos, os agenciamentos coletivos da enunciação!!!!!
redes sociais não interessa muito entender densidade das redes, nem seus níveis hierárquicos. Importa estudar a maneira dessa comunidade taggear. A emergência de conceitos (talvez pierre nao tenha percebido que a web semantica eh bem mais simples e esta sendo construida de baixo para cima. vale ler a sua filo para poder compreender melhor essas tendencias; eu sugiro tb o weinberger. aliás, eh esse cara q faz a minha cabeça.
A análise detalhada da terceira camada do ciberespaço (a web) era necessária para justificar a construção detalhada de uma quarta camada, propriamente semântica. A principal função desta quarta camada, que chamo inteligência possível, é endereçar os conceitos, as idéias ou as noções e, conseqüentemente, indexar os documentos pelos conteúdos, independentemente das línguas naturais nas quais estes documentos foram produzidos e os sistemas de classificação particulares que permitem hoje explorá-los.
acho interessante esse caminho do levy. apesar de eu ter quase que escurraçado as idéias do levy nos idos de 2000 en diante. Pois. no meu entender, o levy não conseguiu entender as redes de colaboração, o software livre e os efeitos da linkania.
weinberger >> everything is miscellaneous
The digital revolution in organization sweeps beyond how we find odd photos and beyond how we organize our businesses’ information assets. In fact, the third-order practices that make a company’s existing assets more profitable, increase customer loyalty, and seriously reduce costs are the Trojan horse of the information age. As we all get used to them, third-order practices undermine some of our most deeply ingrained ways of thinking about the world and our knowledge of it.
For example, medical information that used to come only through the careful filters of medical experts and medical publications is now available to everyone prior to the basic housekeeping processes of being gone through and put away. The miscellanizing of this information not only breaks it out of its traditional organizational categories but also removes the implicit authority granted by being published in the paper world. Second-order organization, it turns out, is often as much about authority as about making things easier to find.
We have entire industries and institutions built on the fact that the paper order severely limits how things can be organized. Museums, educational curricula, newspapers, the travel industry, and television schedules are all based on the assumption that in the second-order world, we need experts to go through information, ideas, and knowledge and put them neatly away.
But now we—the customers, the employees, anyone—can route around the second order. We can confront the miscellaneous directly in all its unfulfilled glory. We can do it ourselves and, more significantly, we can do it together, figuring out the arrangements that make sense for us now and the new arrangements that make sense a minute later. Not only can we find what we need faster, but traditional authorities cannot maintain themselves by insisting that we have to go to them. The miscellaneous order is not transforming only business. It is changing how we think the world itself is organized and—perhaps more important—who we think has the authority to tell us so.
continuando:
tagging lets us organize the vastness of the Web -- and even our email, as Gmail has shown -- using the categories that matter to us as individuals. You may want to tag,
tagging is social. Tags used to be called “keywords,” and they've been with us for a long time. But only recently have we been making them public. That has big effects. (...)
Tagging also allows social groups to form around similarities of interests and points of view. If you're using the same tags as I do, we probably share some deep commonalities.
emergência das tags >> zeitgeist
mapeamentos das tags >> mapeiam os conhecimentos, os agenciamentos coletivos da enunciação!!!!!
redes sociais não interessa muito entender densidade das redes, nem seus níveis hierárquicos. Importa estudar a maneira dessa comunidade taggear. A emergência de conceitos (talvez pierre nao tenha percebido que a web semantica eh bem mais simples e esta sendo construida de baixo para cima. vale ler a sua filo para poder compreender melhor essas tendencias; eu sugiro tb o weinberger. aliás, eh esse cara q faz a minha cabeça.
Comentários
Enviar novo comentário